-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 10/2/09 7:22 AM, kael wrote: > On 10/02/2009 11:56 AM, Dave Cridland wrote: >> A PEP-style +notify is an explicit request to receive those PEP >> events (or rather, the PEP events from those nodes) in practise, and >> so should be honoured irrespective of the priority. > > This is also the way I interpret the combination of both rules, the > '+notify' one appears as an exception to the general one about negative > priority.
Correct. If you don't want to receive that information at a node with negative priority, don't advertise +notify for that feature. I think there are use cases for enabling a negative-priority entity to receive PEP updates (e.g., silent aggregators or listeners). Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkr2j0sACgkQNL8k5A2w/vyUtQCeKe8/OxBcScvUnlg8zTG4/BJd LVAAnAvXzzPpnu5ZwHZOS67pNtTHPOAW =W0kD -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
