Blaine,
Not sure what you mean, but I had previously updated the file there :
http://superfeedr-misc.s3.amazonaws.com/pubsubhubbub-core-0.4.html

Feel free to send your changes here, and I'll make sure I reflect them
there :)

Ju

On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 5:15 PM, Blaine Cook <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 2 May 2012 14:01, Julien Genestoux <[email protected]> wrote:
> > All,
> > I just pushed an updated version of this draft.
> > It now includes the following (minor) points:
> > - Comments/Fixes by Walter Groix,
> > - Symetric "accepted" and "denied" when the hubs validates the
> subscription
> > - Use of From header (based on Blaine's feedback)
> > - Use of Location header when "denied" to indicate that another
> > - Allowing for discovery thru host-meta well known url.
> >
> > Please, feel free to review and submit any change that is appropriate.
>
> This sounds awesome, Julien!
>
> My comments:
>
> – I'd suggest the following text for §4❡2 (major change is to use
> RFC6415 explicitly):
>
> "In the absence of HTTP Link headers, subscribers SHOULD fall back to
> other methods to discover the hub(s) and the canonical URI of the
> topic. If the topic is a Atom or RSS feed, the publisher MAY provide
> embedded link elements as described in Appendix B of Web Linking
> [RFC5988], and the subscriber SHOULD use those links as per Appendix B
> of [RFC5988]. Similarly, for HTML pages, the publisher MAY use
> embedded link elements as described in Appendix A of Web Linking
> [RFC5988], and subscribers SHOULD use those links as per Appendix A of
> [RFC5988]. Finally, publishers MAY also use Web Host Metadata
> [RFC6415] to include the <Link> element with a rel-value equal to
> "hub" as with the other approaches; publishers SHOULD provide the JSON
> variant of [RFC6415]. Subscribers SHOULD support this method for
> discovery.
>
> OOPS.
>
> I started reading the spec at the link you posted and realised that
> it's not the updated one at all. I don't know if the above comment
> stands, but I'll hold off until the link is updated. :-)
>
> b.
>

Reply via email to