David Henningsson <[email protected]> wrote: > I think the primary objection was not that there was a use case or need > for the mono-upmix-only option. The objection was mostly that having a > "enable-remixing = no" option that actually did remixing would be quite > confusing.
> http://www.sersc.org/journals/IJSIP/vol2_no4/7.pdf Good document, thanks. And independent from Dolby. And describes more than one upmixing method. So, can we call the following proposal a consensus? 1. Rename the enable-remixing options to something (e.g. remixing-method) that does not look boolean. Obviously, rename its values. 2. If there is still time, propose the implementation of all upmixing methods described in that paper as a GSoC project. -- Alexander E. Patrakov Sent from Nokia N900 _______________________________________________ pulseaudio-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss
