David Henningsson <[email protected]> wrote: > If we already have enable-remixing and enable-lfe-remixing, perhaps we > should add another y/n option named enable-mono-upmixing ?
Not sure. First, it looks like the enable-lfe-remixing option may become non-boolean, too (see the threads on lfe filtering). Second, I would like to make sure that any proposed combination of boolean and non-boolean settings has the following properties. All reasonable user requests WRT remixing should be expressible with the proposed settings. There should not be many meaningless combinations of options. And there should really be no values that nobody would want to set. So someone needs to map the proposals and use cases to some options. > I don't think it makes sense to implement *all* the upmixing methods. I > think it's better to select one and implement that one. Point taken. -- Alexander E. Patrakov Sent from Nokia N900 _______________________________________________ pulseaudio-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss
