Le jeudi 09 octobre 2014 à 18:46 +0530, Arun Raghavan a écrit : > Strong nack for fixing without figuring it out. Can we have a bug > report please? > > -- Arun
Agreed about not applying a patch/fix (none were send and I made it explicit I had only a workaround). All I ask is information to know if there might be a bug in pulseaudio. I asked if minreq should be <= prebuf , as the only proportion between those two I found was to init "prebuf = tlength" and "minreq=tlength/5". This 1 to 5 proportion I found in "PULSE_LATENCY_MSEC" code. And the documentation tell about minreq "will initialize this to a value that is deemed sensible by the server". In short I look for what would be "deemed sensible by the server". Should I send a bug report about that or is the ML more appropriate a field ? Best, Alban _______________________________________________ pulseaudio-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss
