Issue #7616 has been updated by Marc Villacorta.
Yes, this is the behavior that I expected. I understand it can be achieved in different ways. I tried the proposed approach to keep my code neater (more magic) ;-) Ignoring explicitly undefined resources makes sense to me. Just wanted to share my thoughts and see how do you feel about it. ---------------------------------------- Feature #7616: Declare undefined resources. https://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/7616 Author: Marc Villacorta Status: Unreviewed Priority: Normal Assignee: Category: Target version: Affected Puppet version: Keywords: Branch: I would like to declare undefined resources to do something like this: <pre> case $operatingsystem { CentOS:{ $step_tickers = '/etc/ntp/step-tickers' } Debian:{ $step_tickers = undef } } file { $step_tickers: ensure => present, content => '0.centos.pool.ntp.org' } </pre> -- You have received this notification because you have either subscribed to it, or are involved in it. To change your notification preferences, please click here: http://projects.puppetlabs.com/my/account -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Bugs" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-bugs?hl=en.
