Issue #11609 has been updated by Jeff McCune.
Alex Harvey wrote: > Jeff, I wonder if it is likely that there is OS neutral code in the community > that assumes that it's valid to loop over CPUs using for processorN in > 0..processorcount that would be broken in the case of this CPU numbering? I don't think there is. I just `ack`'ed through all of the modules currently hosted on the Forge and the only instance of "processor" is in `mafalb-irqbalance` where the `processorcount` fact is used. I don't see any use of looping over the processorN facts. I think this is a well-intentioned concern, but it'd be a premature optimization. -Jeff ---------------------------------------- Bug #11609: aix facter show additional number ahead the cpu model https://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/11609#change-73715 Author: hongbo hu Status: Investigating Priority: Normal Assignee: Jeff McCune Category: library Target version: Keywords: aix facter Branch: Affected Facter version: 1.6.4 processor0 => 0PowerPC_POWER6 -- You have received this notification because you have either subscribed to it, or are involved in it. To change your notification preferences, please click here: http://projects.puppetlabs.com/my/account -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Bugs" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-bugs?hl=en.
