On Jul 20, 2009, at 8:01 AM, Nigel Kersten wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 7:48 AM, James Turnbull<[email protected] > > wrote: >> Nigel Kersten wrote: >>> So the missing piece with this new setup seems to be that you *must* >>> create a fileserver.conf entry of: >>> >>> [modules] >>> allow * >>> >>> for modules in environments to work correctly, whether or not you >>> represent the URI in the old style: >>> puppet:///modulename/filename.txt >>> >>> or the new style: >>> puppet:///modules/modulename/filename.txt >>> >>> Patch working happily after that. >> >> Is this unexpected behaviour? Should we have an error message >> triggered >> somehow or will updates and documentation be sufficient? > > I kind of feel like we should automatically create the modules mount > just like we do the plugins and facts mount points, but if others > disagree, we should at the very least provide an example > fileserver.conf that is well commented?
We should be, and I thought we were. -- Commit suicide. A hundred thousand lemmings can't be wrong. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Luke Kanies | http://reductivelabs.com | http://madstop.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
