On 20/07/09 18:31, Nigel Kersten wrote: > On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 9:21 AM, Brice > Figureau<[email protected]> wrote: >> On Mon, 2009-07-20 at 06:55 -0700, Nigel Kersten wrote: >>> So the missing piece with this new setup seems to be that you *must* >>> create a fileserver.conf entry of: >>> >>> [modules] >>> allow * >> I always had this one along with the plugins one, even back in 0.23.X. >> I thought it was mandatory. >> (In fact I never touched my fileserver.conf since I started using Puppet >> two years ago). > > Yeah, I only ever had [facts] and [plugins] defined, so this mustn't > have been necessary in earlier versions. > >>> for modules in environments to work correctly, whether or not you >>> represent the URI in the old style: >>> puppet:///modulename/filename.txt >>> >>> or the new style: >>> puppet:///modules/modulename/filename.txt >>> >>> Patch working happily after that. >> Cool :-) > > Well working happily with webrick.... :) I've run into some issues > with Passenger, but still working out where the bugs are for that.
I'm really not sure, but you might have to apply Christian's patch named: rack: don't directly use the forbidden HTTP_CONTENT_TYPE env var (fixes rack specification conformance) This patch was posted here a couple of days ago. -- Brice Figureau My Blog: http://www.masterzen.fr/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
