On 20.07.2009, at 18:31, Nigel Kersten <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 9:21 AM, Brice
> Figureau<[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 2009-07-20 at 06:55 -0700, Nigel Kersten wrote:
>>> So the missing piece with this new setup seems to be that you *must*
>>> create a fileserver.conf entry of:
>>>
>>> [modules]
>>> allow *
>>
>> I always had this one along with the plugins one, even back in  
>> 0.23.X.
>> I thought it was mandatory.
>> (In fact I never touched my fileserver.conf since I started using  
>> Puppet
>> two years ago).
>
> Yeah, I only ever had [facts] and [plugins] defined, so this mustn't
> have been necessary in earlier versions.
>
>>
>>> for modules in environments to work correctly, whether or not you
>>> represent the URI in the old style:
>>> puppet:///modulename/filename.txt
>>>
>>> or the new style:
>>> puppet:///modules/modulename/filename.txt
>>>
>>> Patch working happily after that.
>>
>> Cool :-)
>
> Well working happily with webrick.... :) I've run into some issues
> with Passenger, but still working out where the bugs are for that.
>

FYI, passenger >= 2.2.3 is currently unsupported; I need to finish a  
patch for that.

Christian

>
> -- 
> Nigel Kersten
> [email protected]
> System Administrator
> Google, Inc.
>
> >

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Puppet Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to