Brice Figureau wrote: > BTW, I'm wondering how puppetdoc will deal with future > "interpretation" :-(
A simple way would be to just "ignore" that in puppetdoc. Then strings only show the variable name and that's it. For a more intimate support, you can evaluate the future down to either the value, if it is known, or the expression the future holds, if parts of it are not know. The latter may happen if the future references (transitively) a facter fact or a function like extlookup or a module that is not parsed in this puppetdoc run (if that's even possible). So I think that should not be a big problem if the future allows access to its (semantical) structure. Regards, DavidS -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en.
