I agree that cleaning this particular debt up probably doesn't need to be an immediate priority. ~ Jesse
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Markus Roberts <[email protected]>wrote: > > Hmm. I'm a bit up in the air on this. Whomever takes this refactor on > will > > be doing a significant memory swap, and it's likely to be a refactor of > both > > the facts and Facter itself (to provide whatever necessary infrastructure > > for this kind of data sharing). > > > > Note that at this point it's a question of working on the features for > rowlf > > or refactoring facter, and I'm not convinced that facter is the bigger > win. > > I'll check around internally, though, and see what we see. > > When Jesse brought this up last week I was ambivalent, leaning towards > let-it-lay but open to persuasion if there was a win to be had. It's > not that I'm not in favor of paying off technical debt, just that we > have so much of it relative to our bandwidth that we need to be > careful we don't try to do everything and wind up doing nothing. > > -- Markus > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Puppet Developers" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<puppet-dev%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en.
