On 2 February 2010 12:50, Ohad Levy <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 for fixing the problem now, and refactoring facter after rowlf.
Sure - if that's the priority I agree Rowlf is more important. The problem, to me, is we've repeatedly made that call and now haven't had a Facter release for quite some time. We've also said quite a lot lately that a key input to Puppet's future direction is richness of data and the ability to do more with the data available to Puppet. I see Facter as critical to that - perhaps not immediately as critical as Rowlf but up there. Without rich data output from Facter I think we'll find exploiting future directions potentially problematic. But just my ten cents... Regards James -- Author of: * Pro Linux System Administration (http://tinyurl.com/linuxadmin) * Pulling Strings with Puppet (http://tinyurl.com/pupbook) * Pro Nagios 2.0 (http://tinyurl.com/pronagios) * Hardening Linux (http://tinyurl.com/hardeninglinux) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en.
