So - does it mean I get a +1 ? ;) On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Luke Kanies <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I agree. > > Facter is fortunately a small code base, so it should be relatively easy to > refactor, and I would like to do so with the following foci: > > * Fix outstanding issues like the above > > * Create a new shadowfacter-style programming interface > > * Support qualified facts (e.g., disk::sd1 or operatingsystem::release) > > * Support both arrays and hashes as values > > None of those are complicated, so I expect my team will have a short code > sprint and get it done. But again, it'll be after rowlf. > > -- > It is a very sad thing that nowadays there is so little useless > information. -- Oscar Wilde > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Luke Kanies -|- http://reductivelabs.com -|- +1(615)594-8199 > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Puppet Developers" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<puppet-dev%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en.
