Le mercredi 14 avril 2010 à 12:07 -0700, Jesse Wolfe a écrit : > > the new puppet single-executable is in master, but I think the names > of the commands should be up for discussion. These are something that > we may have to live with for a long time. > > Here's what's currently in master: > bin/filebucket => puppet filebucket > bin/pi => puppet pi > bin/puppetdoc => puppet doc > sbin/puppetca => puppet ca
+1 for puppet cert > sbin/puppetmasterd => puppet server > sbin/puppetrun => puppet run puppet trigger or remotetrigger would be probably better no ? > bin/puppet => puppet main > bin/ralsh => puppet resource > sbin/puppetd => puppet agent > sbin/puppetqd => puppet queue queuer ? asyncd ? > Here's my commentary: > bin/pi => puppet pi (what does "i" stand for, anyway?) > sbin/puppetmasterd => puppet server (I'd rather keep the "master" > jargon) +1 for master > bin/puppet => puppet main (doesn't seem very main to me. > "exec"? "do"?) parse ? parser ? > sbin/puppetd => puppet agent (is "agent" the jargon we use in > training? I can't remember) agent would be fine IMHO Nico.
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
