----- "Luke Kanies" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Anyway, as I said above, we've gotten pretty far afield from where > this started. I think the solution for 2.6 is to include Ohad's > variant of extlookup, probably naming the function 'lookup'. As much > as I'd love to get it static, I don't think it's reasonable on the > timeframe we're on.
if you did http://projects.reductivelabs.com/issues/1545 you'd get module path searching for free in extlookup. And you wouldnt loose the features ohad didnt implement in his version of extlookup. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en.
