----- "Luke Kanies" <[email protected]> wrote: > On Jun 9, 2010, at 5:09 AM, R.I.Pienaar wrote: > > > > > ----- "R.I.Pienaar" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> ----- "Luke Kanies" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> Anyway, as I said above, we've gotten pretty far afield from > where > >> > >>> this started. I think the solution for 2.6 is to include Ohad's > >>> variant of extlookup, probably naming the function 'lookup'. As > >> much > >>> as I'd love to get it static, I don't think it's reasonable on > the > >> > >>> timeframe we're on. > >> > >> if you did http://projects.reductivelabs.com/issues/1545 you'd get > >> module path searching for free in extlookup. > > > > actually i lie, it wouldnt work with environments still but thats an > > > easy fix. > > > > > >> And you wouldnt loose the features ohad didnt implement in his > >> version > >> of extlookup. > > > > point remains, if you merge Ohads version that lacks some features, > > > current extlookup users will be still stuck maintaining extlookup > > probably. > > > > You never replied to my mail regarding the nasty global variable > > approach to configuring both extlookup and ohad's that I think just > > > isnt right if you're going to merge it. Can you think of a quick > > easy way to improve that? > > What is the global variable problem, again?
configuring the search order and behavior of the tools is done with a variable in site.pp, which feels very hacky to me. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en.
