On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 5:04 PM, R.I.Pienaar <[email protected]> wrote: > > ----- "Luke Kanies" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Anyway, as I said above, we've gotten pretty far afield from where > > this started. I think the solution for 2.6 is to include Ohad's > > variant of extlookup, probably naming the function 'lookup'. As much > > as I'd love to get it static, I don't think it's reasonable on the > > timeframe we're on. > > if you did http://projects.reductivelabs.com/issues/1545 you'd get module > path searching for free in extlookup. > > And you wouldnt loose the features ohad didnt implement in his version of > extlookup. > > which features are those? maybe its an easy fix
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en.
