As announced I'll send a squashed commit, as I assume that nobody
reviewed the
previous patch so far, hence I assume nobody is interested in the
changes I did
between these two series. Or is somebody?
Thanks for reviewing!
Peter
We're interested - I promise! There's a huge clinet deadline being
juggled internally (there are only a few developers :) ) and we're
working towards getting some community patches reviewed as soon as possible.
Hmm, sorry I didn't want to sound it that way. Take your time! It also
took me ages to integrate your comments.
I was more referring to the issue that I squashed my fixes for
definitions into the large patch for #1886. That means that these
fixes aren't visible by themself, but I thought that this should be
fine, as the previous patchset wasn't yet reviewed (which is totally
fine!).
Sorry, if that sounded wrong.
~pete
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet
Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en.
