Nigel Kersten wrote: > On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 7:29 AM, James Turnbull <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> I'm also contemplating moving the patch outside of puppet core as Luke >>> was suggesting. >> I'm actually going to make a case with Nigel to merge it into Statler >> but I fear he may chase me around the office with a shovel when I do. :) > > I expect this code to get more additions for other hardware reasonably > quickly. > > We're going to be very strict about not adding features to Statler > once it ships, so it may make more sense for this to be a module that > can have an independent release cycle.
So I'd make an argument to say - add the utility functions and base to Statler and make additional support available in modules. That way we get traction on the core features whilst not stopping people adding additional support for other devices. James -- James Turnbull Puppet Labs 1-503-734-8571 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en.
