On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 08:40 -0700, James Turnbull wrote: > Nigel Kersten wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 7:29 AM, James Turnbull <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >>> I'm also contemplating moving the patch outside of puppet core as Luke > >>> was suggesting. > >> I'm actually going to make a case with Nigel to merge it into Statler > >> but I fear he may chase me around the office with a shovel when I do. :) > > > > I expect this code to get more additions for other hardware reasonably > > quickly. > > > > We're going to be very strict about not adding features to Statler > > once it ships, so it may make more sense for this to be a module that > > can have an independent release cycle. > > So I'd make an argument to say - add the utility functions and base to > Statler and make additional support available in modules. That way we > get traction on the core features whilst not stopping people adding > additional support for other devices.
That would be terrific! I'm sold. I still believe there is some more work and polishing to do on the part that might end up in Statler. I'll try to devote some time soon on this project. Side note: did the list config change? Replying to a list-email now goes directly to the original poster and not to the list anymore (or my mail config is kaput). -- Brice Figureau Follow the latest Puppet Community evolutions on www.planetpuppet.org! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en.
