On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 8:40 AM, James Turnbull <[email protected]> wrote: > Nigel Kersten wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 7:29 AM, James Turnbull <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>>> I'm also contemplating moving the patch outside of puppet core as Luke >>>> was suggesting. >>> I'm actually going to make a case with Nigel to merge it into Statler >>> but I fear he may chase me around the office with a shovel when I do. :) >> >> I expect this code to get more additions for other hardware reasonably >> quickly. >> >> We're going to be very strict about not adding features to Statler >> once it ships, so it may make more sense for this to be a module that >> can have an independent release cycle. > > So I'd make an argument to say - add the utility functions and base to > Statler and make additional support available in modules. That way we > get traction on the core features whilst not stopping people adding > additional support for other devices.
+1 -- Nigel Kersten Product, Puppet Labs @nigelkersten -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en.
