On Aug 15, 2013, at 11:08 AM, Dustin J. Mitchell <[email protected]> wrote:

> I had no awareness of the office hours (which is probably also my fault), but 
> that sounds like a great idea.

No, it's on me -- I have not been disciplined about promoting office hours and 
keeping to them.  You're totally right that it's about virtuous circles, and 
giving ARMs love is a huge part of that. Momentum doesn't create itself; it 
takes a huge effort (one I probably underestimated) to get the wheels moving. 
JD, Henrik and I are hosting an event at puppetconf that I hope will kick-start 
this back into virtuousness: http://sched.co/14zaQjw  Please (you and anyone 
else tuned in!) stop by and help figure out how to make this better. (We'll 
have an G+ hangout or IRC backchannel for this as well, for people who are 
interested but can't be there in person)

I talked with Brandon Burton and the #hangops folks about how they run their 
hangouts. There's no way to make a recurring public hangout at a known URL, so 
they tweet out that week's URL before it starts, which i wasn't super happy 
about but didn't follow through on to come up with something else.


> I struggle with the same problem in Buildbot: how do I keep people informed 
> and solicit meaningful feedback without overwhelming them

Yep, exactly.

> 
> One, perhaps unorthodox, technique is something you're already doing - 
> publicly thank and recognize community members for their contributions and 
> commitment.  That creates a virtuous cycle of higher expectations.  It's 
> certainly a part of why I feel culpable for not reading ARMs!
> 
> Other efforts to engage people with the new ideas may help, as well.  The 
> ARMs are pretty deeply technical documents, so perhaps these hangouts or 
> office hours can be a place for users to start with a quick summary of the 
> ARM, and then drill down into potential concerns.
> 
> Luke: the bug about parameterized classes was just the thing that prodded me 
> to the action of sending this email (I originally typed it in Redmine, but it 
> was *way* off-topic!).  So let's keep talk of that specific issue in redmine. 
>  Your suggestion (errors now, lazy evaluation later) sounds perfectly 
> reasonable.

Thanks for starting this discussion, Dustin.


Eric Sorenson - [email protected]
#puppet irc: eric0 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Puppet Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to