On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Jacob Helwig <ja...@puppetlabs.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 26 May 2011 09:38:28 -0700, Jacob Helwig wrote: > > > > As promised yesterday, here are the results of our first planning > > meeting. > > > > Right now, we're loosely following a Scrum style of development. With > > the current one-week iteration's backlog outlined below. > > > > * #2128 - Allow arbitrary fact as node_name identifier > > > > * #7224 - Bad english: hostname was not match with the server > > certificate > > > > * #4416 - Resources cannot be used on the run where they are synced > > > > * Package type V2 (apt) > > > > * Package type V2 (dpkg) > > > > * Package type V2 (aptitude) > > > > We're trying to work on things that we know have annoyed people using > > Puppet. We are very open to any suggestions on what to add to the > > following iterations, so please vote on tickets in Redmine[1], and > > comment on these updates. > > > > The "Package type V2" items don't currently have any tickets in Redmine, > > but the goal will be to clean up the current package type in the hopes > > of having a clean, "modern" and well tested type, and set of providers > > that people can use as a reference when writing their own. If the > > experiment in refactoring the package type, and the apt, aptitude, and > > dpkg providers goes well, we plan on continuing on to the rest of the > > providers. > > > > In addition to the iteration backlog, #7670 and #7681 have become > > priorities that we will be addressing as soon as we can. > > > > * #7670 - operatingsystem fact incorrect after clear on Ubuntu > > > > * #7681 - Regression, arrays and variables > > > > [1] http://projects.puppetlabs.com > > > > Just a quick reminder that we're going to have our planning meeting > tomorrow. If you'd like to influence what we end up prioritizing for > ourselves for the coming week, please speak up. > I could be wrong, but I imagine people would quite like to see this issue fixed: http://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/7127 where the prerun_command exiting non-zero doesn't block the run, and I believe the postrun_command doesn't change the report status to failed. > > #7670, and #7681 have both been fixed, and merged into the appropriate > branches to be released. > > I've had one suggestion of working on #650 (Puppet replaces conf > directories when they are symlinks). > > Right now, the back-log looks the same as it did last wednesday due to > the two "blockers" popping up, and the long holiday weekend here in the > States. > > -- > Jacob Helwig > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) > > iQGcBAEBAgAGBQJN5YLwAAoJEHJabXWGiqEBTBoMAIgU7JXHtexP2CCfphlIdca+ > oqz5WHH9aJd97mCfHvVAsKiTReY98ugtX9b4Z+1SG3Q7wQTkD4m8uw6ZoITQJwRu > WgyztfxqZlnvdPZne+bE2XLljAMyehZimxn2sd/gbDxbVHlW0CmP4/8Hz831OlZY > lChS3UX1SEwSDNEbhjdVpMP5Scse+BGTkTcNevWiFknDpNSEpkGEVNY4J6UFYWhT > n3MdNw5kToB9DTpDGlG6RbKzjTKJB5eOjDjPerdhxNj0HacFI36qzi6DcSeY7CpQ > /egZLOTps6Q4ftGxM6YKOXdyeqHSQiLGbBaIYhzEy5PqR3s2fe5FN2f9Aqzrn1LU > +8R8vo56EGole+Ty1QG75yIHcb2f0OF4ekMIMA4EwDGq/vJkYlppGuBp64k9BR/l > EadeGbvSRxVKjiuyAUgi/78sKzJ5TN9fX1tULnGC2ud3OFK+cc4s/lgSJMMe7bqz > s+3pEeUmhj0fVGnEFsaGivnn3swcCiPzSfycZwt7KA== > =0EHz > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > -- Nigel Kersten Product, Puppet Labs @nigelkersten -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
