On Thursday, October 11, 2012 8:37:39 AM UTC-5, alcy wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have a class like:
>
> class wrapper {
> include foo
> include bar
> include baz
> }
>
> And a node like:
>
> node x {
> include someclass
> include wrapper
> Class["someclass"]->Class["wrapper"]
> }
>
> The class chaining in node x doesn't get respected. In irc I was
> suggested there being a possibility of this being related to #8040.
> Can anyone suggest if that indeed might be the case ? Is there a clear
> process to tell if certain chaining of classes or resources would
> mandate using anchors or not ? Just to be clear, there is no order
> required in the classes inside the wrapper class. But just that to
> ensure before any of these, the class "someclass" gets applied. Any
> ideas, and possible approaches would be nice.
>
>From what I can tell, this looks like the main use case for the "anchor
pattern" in stdlib.
https://github.com/puppetlabs/puppetlabs-stdlib
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/puppet-users/-/vd9gYqJEADgJ.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
