On 09/26/2014 11:12 PM, Rob Reynolds wrote: > > Felix, if your "what?" is about Java (the language), that was a > mistake. JVM on the server side, generally written in Clojure, is > the direction things are heading. C++ on the client side. Ruby is > still sticking around in order to support extensions. That said, > some things we'll need to discuss and figure out what the best way > to move forward is. Luke wrote up a good post about some of these > changes > at http://puppetlabs.com/blog/evolving-puppet-for-next-ten-years > > As I said in my original response about apply, that is something > that we still need to figure out and something that will be coming > up on puppet-dev in the future. There is a lot to consider and > discuss in that decision because of the number of people and > systems affected. > > > Yes, apologies about that. I meant JVM, generally written in Clojure. > I was using language from the original statement from Trevor and > should have been more clear.
Thanks guys, I should have been more specific in my wild exclamation :-) I'm good with JVM, but C++ feels like a backward step in many regards. My judgment here may be clouded by reading too many blogpost of them naysayers. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-users/5425F9F9.4010501%40Alumni.TU-Berlin.de. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
