On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 12:52 AM, a.vca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hey karsten, > > it seems reinstalling lenny from scratch, but this time without 'desktop' > will give me a better chance to get puredyne running ? >
well.. it will definitely get you a less bloated system ;-) but for this error it won't help, as the broken dependency problem is in one of our repo. although its painful, I suggest you install some components manually for now, until this problem is fixed. you could use the dependency list of aptitude show puredyne and take out puredyne-puredata (you could manually install the packages you need afterward). this really sucks. I am thinking I should just build a liblame0 package and that solves the problem... hmmmm. best, karsten > > cheers, > jan-kees > > > > krgn wrote: > >> uh, i nuked one or another fedora install. it wasn't hard when I tried >> (especially when trying to install rpms that were non-standard from >> elsewhere), but I seem to have heard from places that rpm got better. >> whatevva.. that circular dependency thing is annoying in a way. but renaming >> libs entirely, snap!, just like that seems like really bad practice to me. >> then again... I wouldn't necessarily want to create and maintain all those >> packages cm does myself if I don't have to. ... .. if I don't have to... >> >> On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 2:25 PM, Atwood, Robert C < >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: >> >> >> Its an annoyance I also find with main Debian , I had some circular >> dependency issue with Jack/fftw3/ardour/ and it did have to do with >> package nameing changes. Also the strange application of strict >> policy that means Jack is split into program and library packs where >> there is no conceivable use of the program without the library (what >> clients could use the demon without using the library???) made it >> difficult to build my own the 'debian way' in order to satisfy the >> deps -- also they named the jack pack with a version number that >> does not reflect the version that is actually in the pack! Im sure >> it seemed like a good idea at the time. >> >> >> However these annoyances are so far smaller than the annoyances I >> have experience with other major distros -RedHat, Suse, Slackware , >> but it's not jsut with the external MM repo but the main trunk too; >> its not quite as bad as RPM dependency-hell! >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on behalf of krgn >> Sent: Tue 22/07/2008 8:43 PM >> To: p:d >> Subject: Re: [pure:dyne] from lenny to p:d, what am i missing ? >> >> hey rob!! those are broken because of debian multimedia changing >> names of >> packages. how annoying. I'm making tickets. >> >> On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 7:21 AM, Atwood, Robert C >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> >> wrote: >> >> > >> > Yes I get a catch-22 situation, since installing pd-pidip requires >> > liblame0, installing liblame0 removes pd-pdp, and puredyne-puredata >> > includes both of these pd-pidip and pd-pdp. >> > >> > # apt-get install liblame0 >> > ... >> > The following packages will be REMOVED >> > libavcodec51 libmp3lame0 libquicktime1 pd-pdp >> > The following NEW packages will be installed >> > liblame0 >> > >> > >> > > -----Original Message----- >> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of jan-kees van >> kampen >> > > Sent: 22 July 2008 12:16 >> > > To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> > > Subject: Re: [pure:dyne] from lenny to p:d, what am i missing ? >> > > >> > > krgn wrote: >> > > > I recommend trying to look at the >> > > > packages that are dependencies of the "puredyne" metapackage and >> > > > installing them manually and see if you get any further. >> > > > >> > > > aptitude show puredyne >> > > >> > > i'm afraid of running into conflicts, and it's realy a lot of deps >> > > >> > > > it would also be useful if you posted the output of the aptitude >> > > > installation command, too, just to confirm or disprove my >> > > suspicion ;-). >> > > >> > > ok, i attached the output, >> > > >> > > jk >> > > >> > >> > --- >> > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> > irc.goto10.org <http://irc.goto10.org> #pure:dyne >> > >> >> >> --- >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> irc.goto10.org <http://irc.goto10.org> #pure:dyne >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> --- >> [email protected] >> irc.goto10.org #pure:dyne >> > > > --- > [email protected] > irc.goto10.org #pure:dyne >
--- [email protected] irc.goto10.org #pure:dyne
