Yes I get a catch-22 situation, since installing pd-pidip requires liblame0, installing liblame0 removes pd-pdp, and puredyne-puredata includes both of these pd-pidip and pd-pdp.
# apt-get install liblame0 ... The following packages will be REMOVED libavcodec51 libmp3lame0 libquicktime1 pd-pdp The following NEW packages will be installed liblame0 > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of jan-kees van kampen > Sent: 22 July 2008 12:16 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [pure:dyne] from lenny to p:d, what am i missing ? > > krgn wrote: > > I recommend trying to look at the > > packages that are dependencies of the "puredyne" metapackage and > > installing them manually and see if you get any further. > > > > aptitude show puredyne > > i'm afraid of running into conflicts, and it's realy a lot of deps > > > it would also be useful if you posted the output of the aptitude > > installation command, too, just to confirm or disprove my > suspicion ;-). > > ok, i attached the output, > > jk > --- [email protected] irc.goto10.org #pure:dyne
