On Mon, 20 May 2013 12:05:35 +0200 Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG <s.pri...@profihost.ag> wrote:
> No it isn't. zfsonlinux.org is stable and useable. I haven't any speed > testing. > From ther FAQ: "To achieve good performance with your pool there are some easy best practices you should follow. Additionally, it should be made clear that the ZFS on Linux implementation has not yet been optimized for performance. As the project matures we can expect performance to improve." (http://zfsonlinux.org/faq.html#PerformanceConsideration) See also this thread: https://groups.google.com/a/zfsonlinux.org/forum/#!topic/zfs-discuss/6-2sqov3usM -- Hilsen/Regards Michael Rasmussen Get my public GnuPG keys: michael <at> rasmussen <dot> cc http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xD3C9A00E mir <at> datanom <dot> net http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE501F51C mir <at> miras <dot> org http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE3E80917 -------------------------------------------------------------- The good oxymoron, to define it by a self-illustration, must be a planned inadvertency. -Wilson Follett
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
