On 10/10/2016 04:29 PM, Adam Thompson wrote:
> The default PVE setup puts an XFS filesystem onto each "full disk" assigned
> to CEPH. CEPH does **not** write directly to raw devices, so the choice of
> filesystem is largely irrelevant.
> Granted, ZFS is a "heavier" filesystem than XFS, but it's no better or worse
> than running CEPH on XFS on Hardware RAID, which I've done elsewhere.
> CEPH gives you the ability to not need software or hardware RAID.
> ZFS gives you the ability to not need hardware RAID.
> Layering them - assuming you have enough memory and CPU cycles - can be very
> Neither CEPH nor XFS does deduplication or compression, which ZFS does.
> Depending on what kind of CPU you have, turning on compression can
> dramatically *speed up* I/O. Depending on how much RAM you have, turning on
> deduplication can dramatically decrease disk space used.
> Although, TBH, at that point I'd just do what I have running in production
> right now: a reasonably-powerful SPARC64 NFS fileserver, and run QCOW2 files
> over NFS. Performs better than CEPH did on 1Gbps infrastructure.
Out of Curiosity, I suppose you're using the default 'NoCache' as the
cache mode of those QCOW2 images ?
pve-user mailing list