On Tuesday, April 05, 2011 13:55:57 Michael Moore wrote: > Hi Benjamin, > > Without running valgrind against the code I'm going to guess. If none of > these resolve the issue, let me know. There are a couple memory related > fixes that may affect server side memory use that have been put in > OrangeFS, I don't know if they made it to 2.8.2 or the code base you're > working from. > > Leaks at server state machine completion > http://www.pvfs.org/fisheye/changelog/~br=Orange-Branch/PVFS/?cs=Orange-Bra > nch:bligon:20100906203050 > http://www.pvfs.org/fisheye/changelog/~br=Orange-Branch/PVFS/?cs=Orange-Br > anch:bligon:20100902155433 > > PJMP related fixes associated with leaks > http://www.pvfs.org/fisheye/changelog/~br=Orange-Branch/PVFS/?cs=Orange-Bra > nch:bligon:20100831190748 > http://www.pvfs.org/fisheye/changelog/~br=Orange-Branch/PVFS/?cs=Orange-Br > anch:bligon:20100831190531 > > Leak in seteattr/geteattr calls > http://www.pvfs.org/fisheye/changelog/~br=Orange-Branch/PVFS/?cs=Orange-Bra > nch:bligon:20090707165459 > > Hopefully it's one of these items, if not, let me know and we can look at > the Valgrind output. > > Michael >
Michael, I've done some more testing and have verified that the fix for the memory leak is indeed in the patches you labeled as "PJMP related fixes associated with leaks". The problem we have is that those patches are on top of new features (mirroring?) not included in the 2.8.2 release, and we are not prepared to take those features yet. Is it possible to provide a patch that implements the same fix introduced in those patches based off of the 2.8.2 release? Thanks. -- Benjamin Severs _______________________________________________ Pvfs2-developers mailing list [email protected] http://www.beowulf-underground.org/mailman/listinfo/pvfs2-developers
