On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Benjamin Severs
<[email protected]>wrote:

> On Tuesday, April 05, 2011 13:55:57 Michael Moore wrote:
> > Hi Benjamin,
> >
> > Without running valgrind against the code I'm going to guess. If none of
> > these resolve the issue, let me know. There are a couple memory related
> > fixes that may affect server side memory use that have been put in
> > OrangeFS, I don't know if they made it to 2.8.2 or the code base you're
> > working from.
> >
> > Leaks at server state machine completion
> >
> http://www.pvfs.org/fisheye/changelog/~br=Orange-Branch/PVFS/?cs=Orange-Bra
> > nch:bligon:20100906203050
> >
> http://www.pvfs.org/fisheye/changelog/~br=Orange-Branch/PVFS/?cs=Orange-Br
> > anch:bligon:20100902155433
> >
> > PJMP related fixes associated with leaks
> >
> http://www.pvfs.org/fisheye/changelog/~br=Orange-Branch/PVFS/?cs=Orange-Bra
> > nch:bligon:20100831190748
> >
> http://www.pvfs.org/fisheye/changelog/~br=Orange-Branch/PVFS/?cs=Orange-Br
> > anch:bligon:20100831190531
> >
> > Leak in seteattr/geteattr calls
> >
> http://www.pvfs.org/fisheye/changelog/~br=Orange-Branch/PVFS/?cs=Orange-Bra
> > nch:bligon:20090707165459
> >
> > Hopefully it's one of these items, if not, let me know and we can look at
> > the Valgrind output.
> >
> > Michael
> >
>
> Michael,
>
> I've done some more testing and have verified that the fix for the memory
> leak
> is indeed in the patches you labeled as "PJMP related fixes associated with
> leaks".  The problem we have is that those patches are on top of new
> features
> (mirroring?) not included in the 2.8.2 release, and we are not prepared to
> take those features yet.
>
> Is it possible to provide a patch that implements the same fix introduced
> in
> those patches based off of the 2.8.2 release?
>
>
Sure, we can work on a backport to 2.8.2. Which of the changes in the PJMP
sets resolved the issue? Was it the addition of the src/server/
pjmp-machines.sm (and changes in getattr to use that) or were other changes
included too?  Did the src/proto/PINT-le-bytefield.c changes (from the 3rd
set of items) make any difference?

Thanks,
Michael


> Thanks.
>
> --
> Benjamin Severs
> _______________________________________________
> Pvfs2-developers mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.beowulf-underground.org/mailman/listinfo/pvfs2-developers
>
_______________________________________________
Pvfs2-developers mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.beowulf-underground.org/mailman/listinfo/pvfs2-developers

Reply via email to