On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 09:53 +0200, Ralf Schmitt wrote: > holger krekel <hol...@merlinux.eu> writes: > > > > > If we are to optionally allow pytest_funcarg__ naming with @pytest.factory > > i wonder if renaming @pytest.factory to @pytest.funcarg would make sense > > and contribute to the notion that pytest-2.3 just extends funcarg > > facilities. The reason i favored @factory is that it really marks a > > factory function whereas "funcarg" more denotes the argument in a test > > or setup function. Moreover, the pytest-2.2 documentation already talked > > about factories when refering to pytest_funcarg__ functions. > > (And @funcargfactory seems a tad long to me). > > > > However, i can't claim to have much of an outside view so i am interested > > in your and other opinions. > > +1 for @pytest.funcarg (mostly because I like to grep for it)
But that would work with "grep @pytest.factory" as well, wouldn't it? _______________________________________________ py-dev mailing list py-dev@codespeak.net http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/py-dev
