I've found that the AIM and ICQ transport can use up to 150mb of
memory before I restart them.  Recently I've actually left them
offline, because I don't chat to people on those networks much
anymore.  (MSN is another story because work 'requires' it).

On 1/24/06, Alexey Nezhdanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ? ????????? ?? ??????? 24 ?????? 2006 17:27 Daniel Henninger ???????(a):
> > I'm not really sure what to tell ya.  Anyone else run into this?  All
> > I can really say is that it's "not happening to me" and that I can't
> > tell what would be causing it.  Have you tried restarting PyAIM/PyICQ?
> Yes, have restarted it. I ever had run it on different boxes (that were
> located in different countries ever).
> Though on seconds server delivering messages was actually quicker (though not
> perfect). May be just not to good connections in both cases?..
>
> > Daniel
> >
> > On Jan 24, 2006, at 8:42 AM, Alexey Nezhdanov wrote:
> > > ? ????????? ?? ??????? 24 ?????? 2006 15:27
> > >
> > > Daniel Henninger ???????(a):
> > >> How long has this been going on?  I've noticed this in the following
> > >> situations . . .
> > >
> > > It beginned about 24 hours back from now.
> > >
> > >> 1. In what seems like the AIM/ICQ servers have rate limited my
> > >> server . . . I don't know that that's what's going on, but during
> > >> these periods I seem to be able to get the same performance from a
> > >> real AIM client and if I just connect from a different ip address
> > >> everything is fine all of a sudden
> > >
> > > I have tried connecting with gaim from the same ip and it worked
> > > instantly w/o
> > > any delays. At the same time I have tried using pyAIM-t and pyICQ-t
> > > from
> > > another completely different IP and it was experiencing less but
> > > similar
> > > delays.
> > > Though this second IP is used for connecting 1000+ ICQ users and
> > > one AIM
> > > user...
> > >
> > >> 2. Something was going on with my network connection at the time
> > >> 3. I had switched to Jive Messenger, which seemed to periodically do
> > >> this for no good reason what-so-ever
> > >> 4. Machine I was running PyICQ/PyAIM on was bogged down for some odd
> > >> reason.
> > >>
> > >> That said, I'm definitely not seeing this behavior now.  =/
> > >>
> > >> Daniel
> > >>
> > >> On Jan 24, 2006, at 1:40 AM, Alexey Nezhdanov wrote:
> > >>> Hello.
> > >>> I have noticed that recently these two transports began to deliver
> > >>> messages
> > >>> very slowly. Actually ICQ delay someimes reaches 60 seconds, and
> > >>> usually
> > >>> about 30-40 seconds. AIM delays is one degree less and variates in
> > >>> interval
> > >>> 5-20 seconds.
> > >>>
> > >>> Is anybody seeing the same behaviour with these transports?
>
> --
> Respectfully
> Alexey Nezhdanov
>
> _______________________________________________
> py-transports mailing list
> py-transports@blathersource.org
> http://www.modevia.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/py-transports
>


--
- Norman Rasmussen
 - Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 - Home page: http://norman.rasmussen.co.za/
From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Tue Jan 24 18:09:53 2006
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Daniel Henninger)
Date: Tue Jan 24 18:10:07 2006
Subject: [py-transports] delays in pyAIM-t and pyICQ-t
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

=(  Maybe, but I hate that there's nothing concrete I can really tell  
you there.  I wonder why gaim is behaving better...  What jabber  
server are you running/connecting through?

Daniel

On Jan 24, 2006, at 11:49 AM, Alexey Nezhdanov wrote:

> ? ????????? ?? ??????? 24 ?????? 2006 17:27  
> Daniel Henninger ???????(a):
>> I'm not really sure what to tell ya.  Anyone else run into this?  All
>> I can really say is that it's "not happening to me" and that I can't
>> tell what would be causing it.  Have you tried restarting PyAIM/ 
>> PyICQ?
> Yes, have restarted it. I ever had run it on different boxes (that  
> were
> located in different countries ever).
> Though on seconds server delivering messages was actually quicker  
> (though not
> perfect). May be just not to good connections in both cases?..
>
>> Daniel
>>
>> On Jan 24, 2006, at 8:42 AM, Alexey Nezhdanov wrote:
>>> ? ????????? ?? ??????? 24 ?????? 2006 15:27
>>>
>>> Daniel Henninger ???????(a):
>>>> How long has this been going on?  I've noticed this in the  
>>>> following
>>>> situations . . .
>>>
>>> It beginned about 24 hours back from now.
>>>
>>>> 1. In what seems like the AIM/ICQ servers have rate limited my
>>>> server . . . I don't know that that's what's going on, but during
>>>> these periods I seem to be able to get the same performance from a
>>>> real AIM client and if I just connect from a different ip address
>>>> everything is fine all of a sudden
>>>
>>> I have tried connecting with gaim from the same ip and it worked
>>> instantly w/o
>>> any delays. At the same time I have tried using pyAIM-t and pyICQ-t
>>> from
>>> another completely different IP and it was experiencing less but
>>> similar
>>> delays.
>>> Though this second IP is used for connecting 1000+ ICQ users and
>>> one AIM
>>> user...
>>>
>>>> 2. Something was going on with my network connection at the time
>>>> 3. I had switched to Jive Messenger, which seemed to  
>>>> periodically do
>>>> this for no good reason what-so-ever
>>>> 4. Machine I was running PyICQ/PyAIM on was bogged down for some  
>>>> odd
>>>> reason.
>>>>
>>>> That said, I'm definitely not seeing this behavior now.  =/
>>>>
>>>> Daniel
>>>>
>>>> On Jan 24, 2006, at 1:40 AM, Alexey Nezhdanov wrote:
>>>>> Hello.
>>>>> I have noticed that recently these two transports began to deliver
>>>>> messages
>>>>> very slowly. Actually ICQ delay someimes reaches 60 seconds, and
>>>>> usually
>>>>> about 30-40 seconds. AIM delays is one degree less and variates in
>>>>> interval
>>>>> 5-20 seconds.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is anybody seeing the same behaviour with these transports?
>
> -- 
> Respectfully
> Alexey Nezhdanov
>
> _______________________________________________
> py-transports mailing list
> py-transports@blathersource.org
> http://www.modevia.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/py-transports
>
>

Reply via email to