Yeah memory management in PyAIM and PyICQ blows right now.  But if  
you restarted, that shouldn't be the same problem . . . well unless  
it's started swapping because there's not enough memory left for  
PyAIM and/or PyICQ.  Easy way to test that might be to only run one  
of them and see if that helps.

Daniel

On Jan 24, 2006, at 11:59 AM, Norman Rasmussen wrote:

> I've found that the AIM and ICQ transport can use up to 150mb of
> memory before I restart them.  Recently I've actually left them
> offline, because I don't chat to people on those networks much
> anymore.  (MSN is another story because work 'requires' it).
>
> On 1/24/06, Alexey Nezhdanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> ? ????????? ?? ??????? 24 ?????? 2006  
>> 17:27 Daniel Henninger ???????(a):
>>> I'm not really sure what to tell ya.  Anyone else run into this?   
>>> All
>>> I can really say is that it's "not happening to me" and that I can't
>>> tell what would be causing it.  Have you tried restarting PyAIM/ 
>>> PyICQ?
>> Yes, have restarted it. I ever had run it on different boxes (that  
>> were
>> located in different countries ever).
>> Though on seconds server delivering messages was actually quicker  
>> (though not
>> perfect). May be just not to good connections in both cases?..
>>
>>> Daniel
>>>
>>> On Jan 24, 2006, at 8:42 AM, Alexey Nezhdanov wrote:
>>>> ? ????????? ?? ??????? 24 ?????? 2006  
>>>> 15:27
>>>>
>>>> Daniel Henninger ???????(a):
>>>>> How long has this been going on?  I've noticed this in the  
>>>>> following
>>>>> situations . . .
>>>>
>>>> It beginned about 24 hours back from now.
>>>>
>>>>> 1. In what seems like the AIM/ICQ servers have rate limited my
>>>>> server . . . I don't know that that's what's going on, but during
>>>>> these periods I seem to be able to get the same performance from a
>>>>> real AIM client and if I just connect from a different ip address
>>>>> everything is fine all of a sudden
>>>>
>>>> I have tried connecting with gaim from the same ip and it worked
>>>> instantly w/o
>>>> any delays. At the same time I have tried using pyAIM-t and pyICQ-t
>>>> from
>>>> another completely different IP and it was experiencing less but
>>>> similar
>>>> delays.
>>>> Though this second IP is used for connecting 1000+ ICQ users and
>>>> one AIM
>>>> user...
>>>>
>>>>> 2. Something was going on with my network connection at the time
>>>>> 3. I had switched to Jive Messenger, which seemed to  
>>>>> periodically do
>>>>> this for no good reason what-so-ever
>>>>> 4. Machine I was running PyICQ/PyAIM on was bogged down for  
>>>>> some odd
>>>>> reason.
>>>>>
>>>>> That said, I'm definitely not seeing this behavior now.  =/
>>>>>
>>>>> Daniel
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jan 24, 2006, at 1:40 AM, Alexey Nezhdanov wrote:
>>>>>> Hello.
>>>>>> I have noticed that recently these two transports began to  
>>>>>> deliver
>>>>>> messages
>>>>>> very slowly. Actually ICQ delay someimes reaches 60 seconds, and
>>>>>> usually
>>>>>> about 30-40 seconds. AIM delays is one degree less and  
>>>>>> variates in
>>>>>> interval
>>>>>> 5-20 seconds.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is anybody seeing the same behaviour with these transports?
>>
>> --
>> Respectfully
>> Alexey Nezhdanov
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> py-transports mailing list
>> py-transports@blathersource.org
>> http://www.modevia.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/py-transports
>>
>
>
> --
> - Norman Rasmussen
>  - Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  - Home page: http://norman.rasmussen.co.za/
> _______________________________________________
> py-transports mailing list
> py-transports@blathersource.org
> http://www.modevia.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/py-transports

Reply via email to