How odd! I can not duplicate this behavior at all! I can send/ receive messages from people who are:
A. on my contact list B. on my contact list but showing as offline (invisible?) C. not on my contact list all with the same speed. This is all very bizarre. Quite frankly I expect things to start behaving "all of a sudden" by now. In the past, I have had times when "Everything OSCAR seems slow" and at some point after (usually half a day to a day), all of a sudden, I'm speedy again. Bah. Anyway, those numbers are very perplexing! Hey James (or anyone really, but I know James has done this recently), can you give me some tips on the profiling work you did on your transport before? I'm not really sure where to start. Daniel On Jan 26, 2006, at 2:26 PM, Alexey Nezhdanov wrote: > ? ????????? ?? ??????? 24 ?????? 2006 22:20 > Alexey Nezhdanov ???????(a): >> ? ????????? ?? ??????? 24 ?????? 2006 >> 21:09 Daniel Henninger ???????(a): >>> =( Maybe, but I hate that there's nothing concrete I can really >>> tell >>> you there. I wonder why gaim is behaving better... What jabber >>> server are you running/connecting through? >> >> ejabberd in one case (where it was slower) >> jabberd13 in other (where it was faster) >> >> I think I'd say "forgot it, I'll do more testing and then report >> back" now. >> The problem is really too not specific and leaves us only to guess >> why it >> is happened. >> >> There can be another answer: may be AOL had been doing something >> nasty... > > Ok. I have done more tests and got more info. > Problem appears only when contacts not yet authorised each other. > Method of testing: > create two fresh ICQ contacts. > initiate chat between them using Psi, ejabberd and pyICQ-t > after exchanging several messages authorise both contacts and > exchange more > messages. > Results (message deliver time in seconds): > > One test: > 56-5-16-20-8-2-3-6-14-26-27-1-25 > AUTH > 23-1-1-2-1-1-2-2-1-8-0-4-4 > > Another test: > 18-3-4-4-28-24-25-3-24-33 > AUTH > 1-1-1-1-1-2-2-2-3-4-2-4-4-1-1 > > I didn't tested gaim in new conditions though. Will try it tomorrow. > > It feels like until contacts authorise each other ICQ server > handles messages > as "offline ones" and processes them on different server that have > much more > delays than realtime one. Though it is just a suggestion. > > Also since in previous testing series gaim performed well in the same > conditions I can suggest that may be gaim was using another submit > method for > offline messages. > Again: I'll try to test gaim tomorrow and will report back. > > -- > Respectfully > Alexey Nezhdanov > > _______________________________________________ > py-transports mailing list > py-transports@blathersource.org > http://www.modevia.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/py-transports > >
