I feel as though at least at this stage the wiki is tightly coupled to PSF
in a way that isn't just infra. In principle the raison d'etre for the wiki
at all is at its core about python. The association with PSF gives this
"place"/wiki the credibility to be a place worth keeping this stuff.
Additionally, at a practical level literally the PSF board and WGs *must* use
the wiki for their business (or so I've heard). We can dismiss the idea of
it being PSF related but that could technically be a misrepresentation.

Looking if there's any obvious prior art, and oh my, found these:

https://wiki.python.org/moin/PythonWikiTasks
https://wiki.python.org/moin/PythonWikiChanges

Note, in my original link it is: https://wiki.python.org/moin/WikiTasks
-> redirect to PythonWikiTasks.

The evidence suggests we are not the first people to have this conversation.

I'm looking forward to actually digging in, that's for sure. I really want
to test the assumption that there is a need for this.

---
Elena Williams
Github: elena <http://github.com/elena/>


On Wed, 12 Mar 2025 at 10:14, Mats Wichmann <m...@wichmann.us> wrote:

> On 3/11/25 16:34, Elena Williams via pydotorg-www wrote:
> > Heya!
> >
> > I'm interested in making a plan for capturing editors, but there are
> > things to unpack.
> >
> > I have notes ready that I'm happy to add to a new page in the wiki, but
> > looking at the "RecentChanges" I see that there isn't a page relating to
> > this that has been added recently (as far as I can tell!). Is that
> correct?
> >
> > I am very happy to make a new page and put my notes and analysis so far
> > there?
> ...
> > I don't mind the idea of something like "PSF Wiki upgrade" or maybe even
> > back to the original idea of "PSF Wiki WG"? (naming things is hard)
> Yeah, we all know the jokes...
>
> There are 2 hard problems in computer science: cache invalidation,
> naming things, and off-by-1 errors.
>
> That's a lot of research, wow!
>
> How about something like WikiRefreshDiscussion (being pedantic I'd
> actually attach the year to it as well like WikiRefreshDiscussion2025,
> somehow I've gotten really sensitive to the staleness topic - not just
> for the Python wiki, as I've noted). I wouldn't include PSF in the name
> - again, personal opinions - it's not really a PSF guided thing, even if
> it may live on PSF infra.
>
_______________________________________________
pydotorg-www mailing list
pydotorg-www@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pydotorg-www

Reply via email to