​Hi,

First, I think it's great that there's been some attention on the site
(even if it was a pointer switch). I'm comfortable with early 2000s web
design, but I realize not everyone is. The new feel of PyGame is a lot more
like something, if I were a neophyte, I'd want to tinker with.

Second, I think it's good that the new site has been made default. This
will force dogfooding. We should leave it that way.

However . . . the new site needs work. It took me *five minutes* to find
the documentation, and I still don't know how to add a project. IMO the
narrow columns and horizontal scrolling are bletcherous too, but I won't
knock the prototype too much, because what I really want to say is that:

*I propose that the website model be made more open for everyone to change.*
I haven't been keeping up with the list, so I apologize if it's been
answered, but it doesn't look like https://bitbucket.org/pygame/pygame is
the location for the site. That is, ordinary users can't submit pull
requests for the site itself. I think this would help us move toward a
better website, faster--and one which, by construction, the community would
value.

Ian

Reply via email to