There are a couple of things being discussed that I think have easy answers.
Docs will remain in sphinx, whatever we do with the rest of the website. They're already using sphinx, and Nikola/Pelican are not decent alternatives for that part. Hosting for the static part will be on github pages or bitbucket. Free hosting is one of the key advantages of a static site. I've used both of these for web sites before. On 18 Dec 2016 7:02 a.m., "Lenard Lindstrom" <le...@telus.net> wrote: > I was looking at Pelican: http://blog.getpelican.com/ > > It looks like Sphinx lite for web sites. Page content can be reST, > Markdown, or AsciiDoc. Jinja templates are used for page generation. > > On 16-12-17 02:26 PM, Thomas Kluyver wrote: > >> >> >> So far, I think the proposals for the static information part of the site >> are Nikola (a static site generator oriented around blogs) and Sphinx >> (oriented around docs). Both are written in Python. Does anyone want to >> make the case for any other system? >> >> >
