Quick points in vague order as I'm quite tired: * Alex has not quit, I believe he owned up to his "non- involvement" (which was evident beforehand). * Anarchy has not ensued. The closest thing we have to anarchy is currently this discussion. * We don't have a development culture, disucssion of code review is rather premature. Pyglet has presumably not had code review so far... * Any implementation of any aspect of project management should be informed by usage and experience in the context in which that implementation will take place. We don't know how many active developers we'll have, what kind of discussion dynamic will go on, whether anyone will partake of an active review process, how much Alex and Richard are going to be involved from this point on. * Finally, not that you should really care for my opinion but I'm rather disappointed by your comparison of what's happening to a train wreck. Pyglet development had stagnated for a long while and this is an opportunity to revitalise it. While I'm sure your intentions are as good as mine in that regard it seems doubtful that I can see eye to eye with you on this issue.
Richard. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pyglet-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pyglet-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
