2009/8/15 Florian Bösch <[email protected]>: > beyond SVN capabilities. It is thus so dissapointing to see you and > your ilk, who presumably cares about the project, become its greatest > hindrance.
Okay, this here is the point where this discussion became out of line. I spent yesterday afternoon fixing Pyglet bugs and committing the fixes to the repository. Richard T did likewise yesterday evening. If doing that, and expressing concern about unneeded changes to the source control system makes us Pyglet's "greatest hindrance", then I'm very sorry, but we intend to be a hindrance for a good time to come. I've tried to remain civil on this issue, largely because I don't think it's very important. I certainly don't think it's a decision we need to make in the near future. I think any move away from centralisation of the project, at this time of "anarchy", is quite likely a mistake, but probably not a huge one. It's obvious that you disagree with quite some force. However, I don't think this entitles you to make personal attacks. As an aside, Florian, I note that you've been posting links to your Mercurial repository on the issue tracker, saying that various issues are fixed in it. Would it be possible for you to either commit these changes to the SVN repo, or if you don't have access (I don't see your name on the list), provide patches so that someone else can. Whatever we decide to do, I don't think we benefit from having two version control systems in parallel use. Martin --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pyglet-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pyglet-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
