On Apr 27, 7:42 pm, Joe Wreschnig <[email protected]> wrote: > Did you look at my repository to see if the thing in it should be > merged? I doubt it, since you didn't comment on it at all. So even > your preferred method is not getting my changes reviewed or merged.
I did not look at your changes because I do not have push rights and I didn't feel like a dedicated project maintainer (the main reason I don't even want push rights). What you raise is valid though, as it is, moving the project forward doesn't work very well (so far nothing changed from the svn situation). I'm assuming those dozen or so people who had commit rights on SVN do have push rights on the hg repo now... The question is, how would we organize ourselves? I think the linux model can work reasonably well. This boils down to a few questions we must answer. - Who has dedication enough to scan (the ML, downstream repos) and review all changes that are suggested in some way on a daily basis? - Who has a focus on a specific area (for instance the cocoa port, backports, bugfixes) and has dedication enough to be a "deputy" for this, acting as a gateway for that topic. - Where do we document the organization structure such that the random person with a change can figure out where to go with his changes? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pyglet-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pyglet-users?hl=en.
