On 02/06/14 22:41, Adam Bark wrote: > Should we really have external libraries in our tree? Perhaps we should > remove pypng; if so, should it just be removed in tip? After 1.2alpha? > Or when it was first introduced? I'm tempted to remove it from the > history but is anyone relying on the 1.1.4 tag? >
I don't know if removing it would be more work than just updating our copy of the lib (it's not just the code, it is referenced in docs). I see the argument behind not including it (gets out of sync, it's just a fallback mechanism, we have already PIL as optional dependency). Regards, Juan -- jjm's home: http://www.usebox.net/jjm/ blackshell: http://blackshell.usebox.net/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pyglet-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pyglet-users. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
