The intention with using pypng was to support pure-python uses of pyglet.
On 3 June 2014 15:43, "Juan J. Martínez" <[email protected]> wrote: > On 02/06/14 22:41, Adam Bark wrote: > > Should we really have external libraries in our tree? Perhaps we should > > remove pypng; if so, should it just be removed in tip? After 1.2alpha? > > Or when it was first introduced? I'm tempted to remove it from the > > history but is anyone relying on the 1.1.4 tag? > > > > I don't know if removing it would be more work than just updating our > copy of the lib (it's not just the code, it is referenced in docs). > > I see the argument behind not including it (gets out of sync, it's just > a fallback mechanism, we have already PIL as optional dependency). > > Regards, > > Juan > > -- > jjm's home: http://www.usebox.net/jjm/ > blackshell: http://blackshell.usebox.net/ > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "pyglet-users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pyglet-users. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pyglet-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pyglet-users. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
