On Apr 20, 2009, at 10:12 PM, C. Titus Brown wrote:
> Hrrm. This may require custom extensions to unittest (which is OK, > but > leads me to think that we may want to go back to nose, instead, albeit > nose with less customized extensions now that pygr.Data is > reloadable). Right, there should no longer be any aspect of pygr.Data that misbehaves due to running many tests serially in nose. If nose caught such a behavior we would treat that as a bug and fix it. So would any nose customizations be needed? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pygr-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to pygr-dev@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to pygr-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pygr-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
