On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 12:38:41AM -0700, Christopher Lee wrote: -> On Apr 20, 2009, at 10:12 PM, C. Titus Brown wrote: -> -> > Hrrm. This may require custom extensions to unittest (which is OK, -> > but -> > leads me to think that we may want to go back to nose, instead, albeit -> > nose with less customized extensions now that pygr.Data is -> > reloadable). -> -> Right, there should no longer be any aspect of pygr.Data that -> misbehaves due to running many tests serially in nose. If nose caught -> such a behavior we would treat that as a bug and fix it. So would any -> nose customizations be needed?
I don't think so. OTOH if all we need is SkipTest, then I think we might as well just modify unittest slightly and run with that modification. --titus -- C. Titus Brown, c...@msu.edu --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pygr-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to pygr-dev@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to pygr-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pygr-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
