[pygr] Re: Finer-grained test specification on the command line

[Istvan Albert]

On Apr 23, 1:30 am, "C. Titus Brown" <c...@msu.edu> wrote:

> -> Or alternatively can we just accept as a known limitation that single
> -> test specification does not work with skipping flag?

ok, I think that what  I meant by skipping tests is different from you
are meaning above.

I meant the runtest.py's -x flag as a way to eXclude tests that should
pass but you don't want to run them. Maybe they take too long or some
other reason. For me calling this as 'skipping' was confusing.

Skipping tests that cannot possibly pass due to some dependencies not
being satisfied is a different task.

> Comments?  I propose #5 as the cleanest option.

Sounds good. One comment: it looks like it subclasses the
_TextTestResult class (the name starts with an underscore). That might
indicate that this class's interface is not stable over different
python versions.

Istvan


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"pygr-dev" group.
To post to this group, send email to pygr-dev@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
pygr-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/pygr-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---