John Pye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 02/08/2006 (13:09) : > Second is that I would like to see the PyGTK site looking a bit more > gnomish. There is some benefit in making at least the site's header > consistent with the GNOME website style: it adds to the perception of > quality, I think. Yes, yes, I know that you don't need GNOME to run GTK, > but then on the other hand, you don't get very far programming GNOME > without learning GTK. But perhaps this GNOME-or-not-GNOME issue revolves > around other issues I don't know about.
How do one run Gnome on Windows? PyGtk is usable on windows, Gnome isn't. So if you tie in Gnome to tightly then one loose the platform indenpendency of Python IMHO. You say one don't get far programming Gnome without Gtk, that is true, but the opposite isn't. One can very well make GTK-clean apps... > Third, I don't think there should be a Python icon in pride of place in > the top left. Python is relevant but it in no way 'owns' PyGTK any more > than GNU owns a project that employs the GCC compiler. The icon also > doesn't mean anything except to people who already know what it is. How > about just a hyperlink from the text in the green 'intro' box? Why on earth should there not be a python icon? Can one use PyGtk for anything else than Python? Sure PSF doesn't own PyGTK, but the logo is used to promote Python and show that this page has relevance to Pythoners. However, about logo usage, Panos check the www.python.org for guidelines when it is appropriate to use/modify it. But let me ask you. Why should there be a Gnome icon? Does Gnome own PyGTK? Preben _______________________________________________ pygtk mailing list [email protected] http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/
