On 8/2/06, Preben Randhol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
John Pye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 02/08/2006 (13:09) :
> Third, I don't think there should be a Python icon in pride of place in
> the top left. Python is relevant but it in no way 'owns' PyGTK any more
> than GNU owns a project that employs the GCC compiler. The icon also
> doesn't mean anything except to people who already know what it is. How
> about just a hyperlink from the text in the green 'intro' box?
Why on earth should there not be a python icon? Can one use PyGtk for
anything else than Python? Sure PSF doesn't own PyGTK, but the logo is
used to promote Python and show that this page has relevance to
Pythoners. However, about logo usage, Panos check the www.python.org for
guidelines when it is appropriate to use/modify it.
But let me ask you. Why should there be a Gnome icon? Does Gnome own
PyGTK?
Hmm...let this not lead to a flame fest.
All PyGTK users are Python users too, but not all of them are GNOME users.
But without GNOME there is no GTK and so no PyGTK.
So let there be both icons to promote both GNOME and Python.
PyGTK is not just binding around GNOME libraries.
PyGTK is binding around GNOME and Python Communities.
Regards,
Baiju M
_______________________________________________
pygtk mailing list [email protected]
http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk
Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/
