Am Mittwoch 28 April 2010 14:10:44 schrieb Peter Scheie: > Sebastian graciously sent me his icon which I tried, but that doesn't work > either, I still get the default pyinstaller icon. Nuts. > What happens if you delete the pyinstaller icon or replace it with your icon :-)
Sebastian > Peter > > On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 1:19 PM, Peter Scheie <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yes, please send me your icon. I did try rebooting Windows to see if > > clearing the icon cache would help, but it did not. I haven't yet tried > > the other methods of clearning the cache. > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 1:18 AM, Sebastian Hilbert < > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Am Donnerstag 22 April 2010 22:58:17 schrieb Peter Scheie: > >> > I took all the files of different resolutions--256, 128, 64, and 32 > >> > bit--and using the article at > >> > >> http://egressive.com/tutorial/creating-a-multi-resolution-favicon-includ > >> ing > >> > >> > -transparency-with-the-gimpas a guide, I also created a 48 and a 16 > >> > bit images, and then combined those > >> > all into an icon using GIMP, but I still get just the default icon on > >> > my executable. Noting that the article only mentions needing > >> > resolution of 128 bit and lower, I also tried throwing out the 256 > >> > bit image, but that didn't make any difference. I noticed that the > >> > 48bit & 16bit images, produced by scaling down the 256bit image, are > >> > also reduced to 4bpp, whereas the ones from Kolourpaint are 8bpp; > >> > might this mixing the resolutions make any difference? Is there any > >> > sort of debug I can turn > >> > >> on > >> > >> > during Build.py to see why it's not using the icon? > >> > >> Would it make sense to send you my icon to see it that works? If it does > >> the > >> problem is with your icon. If not ... > >> > >> Have you considered clearing the icon cache ? I am not sure it is > >> related but > >> ... > >> > >> http://smallvoid.com/article/windows-icon-cache.html > >> > >> > On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 8:54 PM, mac9416 <[email protected]> > >> > >> wrote: > >> > > Peter, I don't know if it makes any difference, but I made the icon > >> > > with GIMP instead of ImageMagik. Might be worth trying that. Also, > >> > > installing pywin32 was the only tweak I had to make to make > >> > > everything work. > >> > > > >> > > On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 8:46 AM, Peter Scheie <[email protected]> > >> > >> wrote: > >> > > > I ran Build.py with the multi-resolution icon on my office system, > >> > > > where py32win was already installed. It builds, and does not give > >> > >> me > >> > >> > > > the 'platform not capable' error that I get on my home machine, > >> > > > but it's > >> > > > >> > > still > >> > > > >> > > > not using the icon I've specified; I'm still getting the default > >> > > > >> > > pyinstaller > >> > > > >> > > > icon. Could it be that it doesn't like my icon? It's only two > >> > >> colors, > >> > >> > > > quite simple. In an earlier incarnation, it was saved in 24-bit > >> > >> color > >> > >> > > (and > >> > > > >> > > > it didn't work). I reduced it to 256 colors (since I'm only using > >> > >> two) > >> > >> > > to > >> > > > >> > > > reduce the size, but that does not seem to make any difference. > >> > > > >> > > Presumably > >> > > > >> > > > the --icon option works under the right circumstances; anyone know > >> > >> what > >> > >> > > > those would be? > >> > > > > >> > > > Peter > >> > > > > >> > > > On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 4:20 PM, Peter Scheie <[email protected]> > >> > >> wrote: > >> > > >> Well, almost solved. pywin32 is installed. Now when I run > >> > > >> Build.py, > >> > >> I > >> > >> > > get > >> > > > >> > > >> "ignoring icon and version resources = platform not capable". I > >> > > >> googled > >> > > > >> > > for > >> > > > >> > > >> that error, but only found one mention, in which Giovanni asked > >> > > >> if > >> > >> the > >> > >> > > >> poster had pywin32 installed, and there was no reply. In my > >> > > >> case, yes, > >> > > > >> > > I do > >> > > > >> > > >> have pywin32 installed. What does this error mean? > >> > > >> > >> > > >> Peter > >> > > >> > >> > > >> On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 7:52 PM, Peter Scheie <[email protected]> > >> > > > >> > > wrote: > >> > > >>> Problem solved! I hadn't installed Service Pack 2 on this VM. > >> > >> Once > >> > >> > > >>> I did, the pywin32 installer ran normally, no questions about > >> > >> which > >> > >> > > >>> ID to > >> > > > >> > > run > >> > > > >> > > >>> under, etc. Thanks for everyone's help. > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> Peter > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 9:38 PM, Florian Höch < > >> > >> [email protected]> > >> > >> > > >>> wrote: > >> > > >>>> Hi, > >> > > >>>> > >> > > >>>> you can easily verify if your download is corrupt by comparing > >> > >> the > >> > >> > > hash. > >> > > > >> > > >>>> A good copy should have: > >> > > >>>> > >> > > >>>> Filename: pywin32-214.win32-py2.5.exe > >> > > >>>> MD5 hash: 09EC5EF23D7A1BAD81B80CF6C00C12A3 > >> > > >>>> > >> > > >>>> HashTab ( http://beeblebrox.org/ ) might be handy for comparing > >> > > > >> > > hashes > >> > > > >> > > >>>> from Windows Explorer. > >> > > >>>> > >> > > >>>> Am 17.04.2010 04:24, schrieb Peter Scheie: > >> > > >>>>> I've tried downloading pywin32 at least six times, including > >> > > > >> > > specifying > >> > > > >> > > >>>>> a mirror in Sweden and the US (Florida) but I always get the > >> > >> same > >> > >> > > >>>>> thing. Of course, it could be that I've always gotten broken > >> > > >>>>> copies, > >> > > > >> > > I > >> > > > >> > > >>>>> suppose. Do you know of a specific mirror that has a known > >> > > >>>>> good > >> > > > >> > > copy? > >> > > > >> > > >>>> -- > >> > > >>>> Florian Höch > >> > > >>>> > >> > > >>>> -- > >> > > >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the > >> > >> Google > >> > >> > > >>>> Groups "PyInstaller" group. > >> > > >>>> To post to this group, send email to > >> > >> [email protected]. > >> > >> > > >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >> > > >>>> [email protected]<pyinstaller%2Bunsubscr > >> > > >>>> [email protected]> > >> > >> <pyinstaller%2bunsubscr...@g > >> > >> > > >>>> ooglegroups.com> > >> > > > >> > > . > >> > > > >> > > >>>> For more options, visit this group at > >> > > >>>> http://groups.google.com/group/pyinstaller?hl=en. > >> > > > > >> > > > -- > >> > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > >> > > > Groups "PyInstaller" group. > >> > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > >> > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >> > > > [email protected]<pyinstaller%2Bunsubscribe > >> > > > @googlegroups.com> > >> > >> <pyinstaller%2bunsubscr...@goog > >> > >> > > > legroups.com> > >> > > > >> > > . > >> > > > >> > > > For more options, visit this group at > >> > > > http://groups.google.com/group/pyinstaller?hl=en. > >> > > > >> > > -- > >> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > >> > >> Groups > >> > >> > > "PyInstaller" group. > >> > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > >> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >> > > [email protected]<pyinstaller%2bunsubscr...@g > >> > > ooglegroups.com> > >> > >> <pyinstaller%2bunsubscr...@google > >> > >> > > groups.com> . > >> > > For more options, visit this group at > >> > > http://groups.google.com/group/pyinstaller?hl=en. > >> > >> -- > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > >> Groups "PyInstaller" group. > >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >> [email protected]<pyinstaller%2bunsubscr...@googl > >> egroups.com> . > >> For more options, visit this group at > >> http://groups.google.com/group/pyinstaller?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PyInstaller" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pyinstaller?hl=en.
